Camera comparison: iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus vs iPhone 5s, Galaxy S5, LG G3, Lumia 1520, Xperia Z2, HTC One (M8)
You can now read:
- iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6 Plus vs iPhone 5s vs Galaxy S5 vs LG G3 vs Lumia 1520 vs Xperia Z2 vs HTC One (M8) Camera comparison
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6 Plus vs Sony Xperia Z3 vs LG G3 vs Galaxy S5 vs Galaxy Note 3 Camera comparison

Introduction
Technology has reached a state where making phone calls is far from a phone's most frequently used feature. Instead, people use their phones to look up stuff on the web, to access social networks, and, of course, to take photos and videos. That's why manufacturers invest a lot of time and effort in equipping their phones with quality cameras.

Colors
We bet you're expecting to see identical performance from the cameras on the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. And you're absolutely correct if you do – their daytime samples have turned out splendid, and we don't see any difference in quality between the two phones' photos. On top of that, color reproduction in the iPhones' images is excellent. Colors are vivid and eye-pleasing, without being blown out of proportion, as other cameras have a tendency of doing. Take a look at the samples below and see what we mean. Notice how in the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus photos flower petals look vibrant and natural with their colors? Most other phones have increased the saturation and contrast in their photos to a point where the same color hues appear overly bright.
The Nokia Lumia 1520 has a lot of potential and is one of the better performers in this race, but its results are rather inconsistent. Some of its photos have excellent color balance and accuracy, while others turn out overly warm or cold. Colors are neutral to vivid, but shades that are bright in real life could end up oversaturated in the produced image.
The Samsung Galaxy S5's camera has a tendency to lean towards the colder side, as is typical for most of Samsung's cameras, actually. That's especially noticeable in shades of red, which appear slightly pink-ish. Color saturation is slightly boosted, and we're okay with that.
The HTC One (M8) could have done better. Some scenes have their colors reproduced neutrally, but in others, there's some serious skewing going on. In our samples below, shades of orange appear yellow, shades of yellow appear white, and the sky's blue hue is very unnatural. Also, we noticed that its camera increases color saturation way too much in cloudy scenes.
Colors

Details
Once again, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus produce photos containing an identical amount of detail. And given the 8-megapixel resolution of their sensor, we're delighted to see how much detail their photos pack. Leaves of trees and blades of grass are clearly visible without being overly soft or sharp. At the same time, there's barely any noise visible in their daytime photos. But the best cameras they are not, at least not in this category.
The camera on the iPhone 5s was, and still is, a formidable contender. Its photos are low on noise and high on details, especially given the lesser resolution of its sensor. It can't quite beat the iPhone 6, but it is good enough to satisfy even the more demanding photographers out there.
Lastly, the HTC One (M8) can't keep up with its mere 4 megapixels of resolution. Sure, the photos are usable, but forget about zooming in and seeing anything pretty as fine details are non-existent.
Details

Indoor

We got mixed results from the Nokia Lumia 1520, which is why we can't give it the top spot even though it has potential. Thanks to its optical image stabilization, it is also capable of producing blur-free, low-noise images. In fact, some of its photos turned out as good as the iPhone 6 Plus's. But others, especially those darker scenes, were somewhat lacking in detail. Noise is suppressed well, but still visible. When the flash is used, most of the light is focused at the middle of the frame, leaving the sides darker than we wish they were.
Then there's the iPhone 5s. Its low-light images are usable, there's no denying that, but we can't ignore the fact that they're quite noisy. Still, there are plenty of details that we can discern easily, which remedies the situation. It has a powerful LED light that helps out greatly when used in low light.
The Sony Xperia Z2 can't keep up with the competition. Blur is easy to spot in its low-light images, and noise spoils the fine details. Its photos are pretty good overall, but not as good as we wish they were. On the upside, its flash performs really well and color accuracy is retained even when it fires.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 produced mostly mediocre low-light photos, which was something we did not expect. Some were decent, some were at the verge of being discarded as unusable due overwhelming amounts of noise or blur. The LED light is strong, but it usually renders the image colder than it actually is.
And lastly, the HTC One (M8) takes acceptable photos in low light, but nothing more can be expected. They're usable as they're mostly free of blur and noise, but most other phones stand a league ahead with their more detailed images. It has an LED light that automatically adjusts its brightness depending on the distance from the subject. Most of the time, it lights up the frame very well, without affecting color accuracy.
Indoor

Night
As we usually do in our in-depth camera comparisons, we took a bunch of night photos to see how the phones handled extreme low-light scenarios. Unsurprisingly, the iPhone 6 Plus once again took better photos than the iPhone 6, with less noise and no motion blur, due to the reasons we described on the previous page. Moreover, it is surprising to see how much detail the 6 Plus has managed to capture with so little light. As for the iPhone 6, its night photos contain a generous amount of details, but there's quite a lot of visible noise. Nevertheless, we're more than satisfied with its perofmance at night.
But the Nokia Lumia 1520 is not to be underestimated. In fact, Nokia's phablet also takes great night photos, with low noise, abundant details, and no blur whatsoever. There's a detail we cannot overlook, however – the automatic white balance set by the camera's software. The warm, yellowish glow from the street lights has been countered with a dose of blue to produce a whiter light tone, and while this isn't a deal breaker, we can't say that we like this artificial color representation.
The LG G3 takes great night photos, but not every single time. While the noise is low and exposure is adequate, we see way too much detail softening in most photos, and that just isn't pretty. Still, if you don't zoom too much, you'll be amazed by the G3's night photos.
The iPhone 5s is, again, capable of producing very good-looking night images, with a good amount of details and proper colors. If you zoom in, you'll see even finer details, but they won't be as pretty due to the heavy presence of digital noise. Still, given the conditions and the fact that it is a 1-year-old model, we're satisfied with its night-time photos.
Our night photos from the Sony Xperia Z2 turned out decent, but still, we were expecting to see better results. Details are soft and grainy compared to what we saw from the aforementioned phones. Also, color accuracy is a bit shaky.
The night-time photos produced by the Samsung Galaxy S5 could not impress us at all. Most of them were underexposed, blurry, or noisy, which made them unusable. That's why having a good light source nearby is advised when taking photos in very low light.
And as for the HTC One (M8), its night photos aren't bad, but they're far from excellent. Let's just say that they're okay. In most cases, the images have poorer details compared to those from the other handsets, but their adequate exposure makes them pretty usable.
Night

Video
Last year's iPhone 5s was one of the best phones for taking videos, and the new models are even better performers in this category. Videos from both the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are smooth, with lots of details and minimal amounts of digital noise. Furthermore, the two show how steady the frame stays when properly-executed image stabilization is applied. The iPhone 6 Plus uses optical image stabilization, which is why its videos are even steadier than the iPhone 6's. Also, we're happy to report that the newly-added continuous auto-focus is one of the fastest we've seen on a phone. The only thing lacking is sound. On both phones, it is of good quality, but its volume is rather low.
The iPhone 5s produces similar results. Like the iPhone 6, it keeps the frame steady using software image stabilization, and the produced footage is silky-smooth. Colors and details are also excellent.
By default, the Samsung Galaxy S5 does not apply any kind of image stabilization, and it shows looking at its videos. But that aside, its videos are actually pretty good, with lots of details and accurate colors. The sound in them is loud and clear.
Videos shot with the LG G3 turn out good, with lots of details and little noise, but could have been better. Dark areas, such as shadows under the trees, are too dark, while light areas, like the sky and the clouds, are too light. The optical image stabilization keeps the frame really steady, and that's a plus. On the downside, the recorded audio sounds digitized and artificial.
The Nokia Lumia 1520 takes detailed videos, but it seems like its optical image stabilization causes the frame to “wobble” a bit. We wouldn't call this imperfection annoying, but it is noticeable. And the sound is quieter than it should be. In fact we can barely hear our own voice in the video.
The relatively low resolution of the One (M8)'s sensor is not holding its camera back this time. Videos are smooth, sufficiently detailed and with accurate colors, although the camera definitely doesn't like it when you're shooting against the sun. We must point out that the sound in the M8's videos is excellent.
As for the Sony Xperia Z2, its videos are stable thanks to the software-based SteadyShot stabilization, but details are lacking compared to what all other phones can produce. At least the sound in the videos is loud and of high quality.
Sample Videos

Conclusion

Now would be a good time to reiterate that the iPhone 6 Plus has a slightly better camera. This became obvious when we compared its night-time photos against those from the iPhone 6. But the difference is rather minor, and unless you're very serious about the quality of your photos, the iPhone 6 should do just fine for your needs.
Grabbing the bronze prize in our comparison, the Nokia Lumia 1520 reminded us that the potential in its 20MP camera should not be underestimated. Nokia's phablet stood out with its extremely detailed images, and had it done better in our indoor test, it would have won the metaphorical silver medal.
As for the LG G3, its 13MP camera couldn't manage to top any of our test categories. Still, it stood its ground with its all-around great performance. The snapper produces very eye-pleasing details in daytime, and given the right conditions, its night photos can leave you impressed.
Then there's the iPhone 5s – a phone that can give the big boys some serious competition even though its 8MP camera has been around since last year. That is especially true when taking videos. In fact, the 5s is, more or less, as good as the iPhone 6 in that respect.
Somewhat surprisingly, the Samsung Galaxy S5 couldn't rank among the top three phones in our comparison. Its daytime photos are detailed and with decent color reproduction, but its low-light performance leaves lots of room for improvement. Its videos are great, but not excellent.
The Sony Xperia Z2 also performed rather disappointingly. Despite having a whopping 20 megapixels to work with, its camera can't match the clear, detailed images produced by its competitors.
Lastly, the HTC One (M8) grabs the attention with its intricate camera setup, but the actual results are often underwhelming. The photos produced lack the details its competitors can produce, and the color accuracy leaves room for improvement.
The final score for each phone represents its average rating, but note that we're only taking into account the Details, Color representation and Indoor categories in the final score. We're factoring all the others (such as Night and Panorama) out, since those represent situations where users are less likely to take images in. Video recording isn't included either, since we consider it a separate thing from photo-taking. We've done this in order to end up with a final rating that is representative of a camera's performance in those areas, which we think are most important to users.
You can now read:
Follow us on Google News
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts: